We still have the world's largest rail network [1]. It's just focussed on freight. (We also have world-class municipal and regional rail in the New York area.)
I wonder what the cost would be to build a passenger rail network that simply parallels the freight network, even if low speed. Amtrak is terrible mostly because freight trains get priority and it screws up the schedules.
> (We also have world-class municipal and regional rail in the New York area.)
If by world-class you mean something that most of the world would consider a rail system, yes (in comparison to most US cities' attempts which aren't really worth even pretending constitutes regional rail). If you mean something that most of the world would consider as something worth emulating, nope.
National passenger rail.
We still have the world's largest rail network [1]. It's just focussed on freight. (We also have world-class municipal and regional rail in the New York area.)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_rail_tran...