> [...] then really you're using "the invisible hand of the market" to enact the change you desire.
It seems to me that many people revering the "invisible hand of market" imply that there's no point acting to cause a social change: the best possible world should emerge from individuals fighting to maximize their financial wealth.
If you take "invisible hand of market" in the widest possible sense, I'd rather call it "natural selection".
It seems to me that many people revering the "invisible hand of market" imply that there's no point acting to cause a social change: the best possible world should emerge from individuals fighting to maximize their financial wealth.
If you take "invisible hand of market" in the widest possible sense, I'd rather call it "natural selection".