EDIT: I corrected the scale for you, but if you want more than a word and a picture, take a look at https://class.coursera.org/compfinance-003/, especially the parts about variance, then ARIMA in Time Series week 4. The data seems quite compatible with an upward trend high variance process with a negative autocorrelation explaining the ups and down.
I may bet on >120 on May 15, but even with my very limited understanding, I would not take a 2 days graph on something as volatile as Bitcoin and try to make a theory.
I'm sorry to be blunt, but I have a problem with misleading content, ie stuff submitted which will waste a small amount of time for a large number of people while there are obvious flaws in the reasoning.
It is not about being overtly pedantic, nerdy or showing off, but spending at least 2 minutes to think before clicking on submit - here, this 120 seconds might have brought the insight that you don't predict nothing with a 2 day graph.
I'm not saying that to bash you or to single you out - I'm spending a couple of minutes replying with the sincere hope that you will realize why it would be a better idea to have acted differently, and upvoting you in the process because at least you showed you cared by replying to your own submission.
For some people, it seems to be a "write only" forum in a karma whoring process - for all I know, it could be to spam the first page, or to attract attention. Sad.
This is good if you want to bet. It's not as good if you want to invest longer term.