Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ah ok, you meant the second thing.

I don't think the Plato's Cave analogy is confusing, I think it's completely wrong. It's "not in the article" in the sense that it is literally not conceptually what the article is about and it's also not really what Plato's Cave is about either, just taking superficial bits of it and slotting things into it, making it doubly wrong.



And you think the comparison to book reviews is equally bad? Both are from GPT-5.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: