Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"always correct"...


Yes. It doesn't change the output, so it is a correct optimization.


Except it's being used in a situation where correctness isn't important. A close approximation is more than fine. In fact, an approximation might be better because it's more generalizable.

Hence, it's a bs thing to say. And it sounds clever - the worst type of bs.


Keeping the same results is playing it safe. Not BS.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: