It wasn't, it passed on the Council of EU.

The AI generated art is also disgusting. Makes the CEO look like an angry kid because his multi-billion dolar industry got a 1% income fine, which is nothing for them, for a service they provide that keeps having outages because they have bad coders who thought moving their shit code to Rust was a good idea.

Italy can also buy the bluff and you know, partner with an EU company to provide them the service Cloudflare would offer "for free".

There is no “EU” company with remotely the same network capacity or capability, in general

BunnyCDN is a good contender for the network. They can find another provider for cybersec.

BunnyCDN don't run their own network, most of their servers are hosted at DataPacket(.com), but they use some other hosting companies too.

DataPacket has a very large network though and is kind of, sort of EU-based. AFAIK most operations are in Czechia, but the company is registered in UK. And there's also the Luxembourg-based Gcore.

Another option is the open source Rocket.Chat.

Last time I checked they were worse.

Well, Chat Control was approved by the Council, so I can't wait for the time Going Dark is also approved by ot.

EU, a democracy idol, now turning into a fascism idol.

You should add the newest zones, Dornogal and K'aresh (or Manaforge Omega raid) to the zone list. They are very heavy on graphics.

Besides, I'd look forward to testinf with the nea ARM emulation layer Valve is developing.

I used to live there and the common consensus was:

- don't stay out in the sun too long, if you do, apply sunscreen

- 10-15 minutes of sunlight exposure a day is completely fine

And loot boxes in Valve games never bothered me, because if you want a particular skin you can just buy it off the market. I can't remember being angry at Valve for having loot boxes.

All other games require you to keep opening loot boxes to get what you want.

Well not with their battle passes in Dota. They employed a lot of FOMO tactics where you had to spend hundreds to guarantee a set that you'll otherwise never be able to get again.

But again, those are just cosmetic items and there's still a market place for them.

it just means they don't follow W3C guidelines :)

> Ironically Firefox is currently at its best and most competitive since its inception

how so?

Fast Rendering and minimal resources usage post e10s, Quantum and Servo components like WebRender. While a lot of these landed a long time ago they then took years to further optimise and iron out edge cases. Chrome used to be the fastest while Firefox used to be slower but memory efficient, both are no longer true as both Chrome and Firefox has improved in those respective areas. Compatibilities are perhaps at all time low? Even during Firefox winning IE era it wasn't anywhere as good as today in terms of compatibility.

The servo was not implemented.

“Servo components” were.

Have you used it recently? It's as fast as any competing browser, has no showstopping problems, has native vertical tab support and is the only place you can still get ublock origin.

AI!