Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | shwaj's commentslogin

I’m not sure whose business model you’re referring to, Cloudflare or Trump/Vance? Or sounds like the former, but I’m not sure how that appeal “validates the view…”.

He's very likely being defensive.

That’s what he’s famous for, huh? Nobody knew who he was until he burst onto the national stage because of his brain worm. And please show a source that he was “proud” of the affliction.

Yes that's what he's famous for. That and being so desperate to find out who hired Sirhan to kill his father.

If he was famous to you before the Trump admin, that's because you're an anti-vaxxer.


It seems like a cheaper model could be asked to review transcripts, something like: “does this transcript seem at all like a wacky conspiracy theory that is encouraged in the use by the LLM”?

In this case, it would have been easily detected. Depending on the prompt used, there would be more or less false positives/negatives, but low-hanging fruit such as this tragic incident should be avoidable.


Matter to who? If you want to deeply understand how this technology works, this is still relevant. If you want to vibe code, maybe not.

If they set the deadline in 10 years, there would be (smaller) mountains generated in that period anyway.

Could always run the posts through a LLM to decide which are about AI :-p

I’ve heard many European non-native English speakers say “a software”, and I see it as a charming reflection of their native languages, where presumably “software” is a countable noun. I think that’s what’s going on here.

That was my concern too. However, the provided links to both the ToS and privacy policy were the standard Google ones (https://policies.google.com/terms), so it seems not to be giving Opal special privileges to read/train on Drive data.

I tried de-selecting that, and it told me to re-login and enable that setting.

Why not both? No need to be so disparaging.

We should be disparaging of fear mongering conspiracy theories that have no facts to back them up. Just like if you told me Democrats in the US are controlling hurricanes, or that 5G caused covid.

Just like those? Those examples are highly improbable, whereas the CIA is almost certainly active in Iran right now (that’s their job!), even if there isn’t evidence that they are behind these particular protests.

> whereas the CIA is almost certainly active in Iran right now (that’s their job!)

This is true of every intelligence agency. Reflexively reaching for the CIA to explain all geopolitics is lazy conspiratorialism.


People are disparaging of dumb conspiracism. This notion that any protest in a dictatorship is a CIA plot is bullshit. The whole “CIA color revolution” concept is bullshit meant to delegitimize and demoralize legitimate grassroots movements against shitty dictatorships. Even the Iranian leadership is publicly acknowledging their legitimacy shortfall and the economic catastrophe, and that’s saying something.

If you don’t believe in protests within dictatorships then you don’t believe in democracy. As simple as that.


"A CIA plot" goes too far, true. But to believe the CIA isn't involved at all in fomenting revolution in a country whose current government is the result of the CIA having done so in the past, and which the US considers part of the "Axis of Evil," and which is an ally to a country the US is currently waging a war of aggression and plunder against (Venezuela) seems naive.

> to believe the CIA isn't involved at all in fomenting revolution in a country

Yes, it’s possible to believe in an incompetent CIA. Particularly when Iran is directly an adversary to multiple countries in the Middle East and further that it’s been fucking with more recently than the 1970s.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: