I don’t see any View Optimal button. Is it present in Mobile ?

I don't see this button either (desktop) but searching the HTML gives a <script> that says

  window.__LEVEL__ = null; window.__DAILY_MODE__ = true; window.__DAILY_LEVELS__ = [{"id":"FswXDo","date":"2026-01-06","dayNumber":8,"optimalScore":86},{"id":"6UV4Yw","date":"2026-01-05","dayNumber":7,"optimalScore":95},{"id":"VfWi_1","date":"2026-01-04","dayNumber":6,"optimalScore":77},{"id":"CNtGPI","date":"2026-01-03","dayNumber":5,"optimalScore":116},{"id":"tnLvlG","date":"2026-01-02","dayNumber":4,"optimalScore":51},{"id":"Qn9vLs","date":"2026-01-01","dayNumber":3,"optimalScore":74},{"id":"Kj7mXp","date":"2025-12-31","dayNumber":2,"optimalScore":90},{"id":"E03KkY","date":"2025-12-30","dayNumber":1,"optimalScore":68}];

EDIT: the view optimal button appears after submission

Results, then scroll down a tiny bit.

For a perhaps easier to read intro to the topic, see https://ai-2027.com/

or read your favorite sci-fi novel, or watch Terminator. this is pure bs by a charlatan

I would say yes, everyone should care about it.

There is plenty of material on the topic. See for example https://ai-2027.com/ or https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/uMQ3cqWDPHhjtiesc/agi-ruin-a...

The fact that people here take AI 2027 seriously is embarrassing. The authors are already beginning to walk back these claims: https://x.com/eli_lifland/status/1992004724841906392?s=20

And I thought the rest of the thread was anxiety-inducing. Thanks for the nightmares lol.

fear mongering science fiction, you may as well cite Dune or Terminator

There's arguably more dread and quiet constrained horror in With Folded Hands ... (1947)

  Despite the humanoids' benign appearance and mission, Underhill soon realizes that, in the name of their Prime Directive, the mechanicals have essentially taken over every aspect of human life.

  No humans may engage in any behavior that might endanger them, and every human action is carefully scrutinized. Suicide is prohibited. Humans who resist the Prime Directive are taken away and lobotomized, so that they may live happily under the direction of the humanoids. 

~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/With_Folded_Hands_...

Lesswrong looks like a forum full of terminally online neckbeards who discovered philosophy 48 hours ago, you can dismiss most of what you read there don't worry

If only they had discovered philosophy. Instead they NIH their own philosophy, falling into the same ditches real philosophers climbed out of centuries ago.

Uh oh. Looks bad.

Is it possible to file a complaint with the ISP or directly with Allot ?

That might help.

It’s cordyceps :-D

Don’t. I would refuse to review a PR with 9000 LOC and 63 new files even if written by a human. Something that large needs to be discussed first to agree on an architecture and general approach, then split in manageable pieces and merged piece-wise in a feature branch, with each individual PR having reasonable test coverage, and finally the feature branch merged into master.

I would say the author recommends the same actually: they say that versioning is “how you change your API responsibly” (so, endorsing versioning), but that you should only switch to a new version as a last resort.

The author does not say that you “should not add v1”. They say that versioning is how you change your API responsibly (so, endorsing versioning), but that you should only do it as a last resort.

So you would add “v1”, to be able to easily bump to v2 later if needed, and do your best to avoid bumping to v2 if at all possible.

CLOCK_MONOTONIC is affected by NTP skewing but should still always increase monotonically (i.e. never decrease)

What happens if someone makes an honest mistake (or is just malicious) and makes their NTP server run fast?

It's system dependent but Linux will generally speed up or slow down the time advancement until the delta from adjtime(...) matches up:

https://linux.die.net/man/2/clock_gettime

   This clock is not affected by discontinuous jumps in the system time (e.g., if the system administrator manually changes the clock), but is affected by the incremental adjustments performed by adjtime(3) and NTP.

https://linux.die.net/man/3/adjtime

   If the adjustment in delta is positive, then the system clock is speeded up by some small percentage (i.e., by adding a small amount of time to the clock value in each second) until the adjustment has been completed. If the adjustment in delta is negative, then the clock is slowed down in a similar fashion.