Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | daneel_w's commentslogin

  while true; do openssl speed ecdsap384 -multi 2; done

> "Even if American equipment is superior ..."

To address the article's context, is the E-3 Sentry superior to the Erieye/GlobalEye?


The E-3 is a dinosaur.

The E-7 Wedgetail is a vastly more capable platform than the Erieye/GlobalEye in pretty much every way, but costs four times as much, and there are other issues with Canada and Boeing as have been pointed out by another commenter.


Delivery schedules are also likely a factor. Assuming the USAF actually orders the E-7, they'll probably get first priority on the Boeing production line. Any export orders would have to wait.

>The E-7 Wedgetail is a vastly more capable platform than the Erieye/GlobalEye in pretty much every way

The airframe itself, perhaps. As for the radar, that remains to be seen. The E-7 uses an L-band AESA radar, whereas the GlobalEye's radar operates in the higher-frequency S-band. In general, higher frequencies are better for engaging smaller/faster targets, but perform worse in adverse weather conditions.

It's been a long time since I took my electronic warfare courses, but in a situation where the radar is expected to spot small drones and other targets I would prefer a higher frequency radar.

It should be noted that the US military itself didn't want the Wedgetail in favor of a space-based solution, until Hegseth forced them for publicity reasons.


Was it just a publicity issue? There was a real risk of a capability gap in that all of the old E-3 airframes would have to be retired long before a space based solution could possibility come online. Plus in an era of anti-satellite weapons proliferation, a crewed aircraft might actually turn out to be more survivable.

Hypocritically, Kegsbreath himself is on record saying the concern was about E-7 survivability: https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/2025/06/us-defence-s...

The comparable aircraft is the more modern E-7 Wedgetail, which has many features that are superior for Canada's use case (notably including range and NORAD integration). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_E-7_Wedgetail

Canada has unfortunately been in conflict with Boeing since before either of Trump's terms, originally triggered by Boeing's trade complaints regarding Bombardier's government subsidies.


is norad integration actually important?

norad might not exist in 5-10 years


Thanks for sharing! I've been a great fan ever since childhood. Phantasy Star 1, 2, 3 and 4 played a huge part in the world of games I grew up with and I consider the series among the best Japanese RPG universes ever made.

There are a hundred variants of it used in various software for the C64, the Amiga, the anything.

And so many variant typefaces of the same graphical language were seen in a million products during the home computer boom of the late 70s and early 80s. Iconic.

It's a copy of the Westminster font from the 60s which was an adaption of the visual style of MICR digits and symbols to a full symbology (without being machine readable). It was a meme for computerbilia of the era that now seems quaint.

> computerbilia

Google finds 2 uses of this word - yours, and a ~1985 newsletter. However, its AI was able to guess it’s a combination of computer and memorabilia.


It's not, and you have.

Rats! Some day I'll remember this. (I am a fan both of JCS and of the author of this page).

This just in: AI Superstar tweets about new stint. Crowd goes wild. News at eleven.

I'm happy with it. Been running OpenSMTPd for many years at this point, on both OpenBSD and Linux, and I have no complaints.

I've also started using OpenSMTPD on linux machines when I need a simple MTA (which is to say, in almost all cases).

Good retro feel. I don't mean to shift the spotlight away from the topic, but a great lightweight alternative is Tiny Player: https://www.catnapgames.com/tiny-player-for-mac/

In reality, most banks perform a lot of these transaction checks in real time to block fraudulent txes up-front, instead of validating tx legitimacy retroactively at a point where the money is already gone. Some 15 years ago a security rep with Nordea (a large Nordic bank) called me late at night asking if I was currently in South Korea and had just a minute ago used my card in a shop. Someone had initiated a "card present" purchase with my card for 1337 SEK (I'm certain this amount was intentional), which Nordea automatically blocked as it was near the edge of possibility relative to my previous card swipe in Sweden earlier in the day, and they wanted to make sure they weren't about to mistakenly strand me abroad by blocking the card.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: