building this openclaw thing that competes with openai using codex is against the openai terms of service, which say you can't use it to make stuff that competes with them. but they compete with everyone. by giving zero fucks (or just not reading the fine print), bro was rewarded by the dumb rule people for breaking the dumb rules. this happens over and over. there is a lesson here

underrated comment

and this is why they bought Peter. i’m betting he will come to regret it.

signal should just add better API / bot stuff and then we could all use that. there's no way OpenAI would be trustworthy for this; slack certainly isn't

The Signal protocol can’t support large groups of people.

found a bug searching for "collagen":

  Failed to execute 'removeChild' on 'Node': The node to be removed is not a child of this node.
  Something broke. We're working on it, but in the meantime, try reloading the page. If that doesn't work, come back later.

  Error ID: b846e2e2ba3b483ab93f10e72ef76820

  NotFoundError: Failed to execute 'removeChild' on 'Node': The node to be removed is not a child of this node.
    at ds (https://pillser.com/assets/entry.client-DWgmqxdv.js:1:112074)
    at gs (https://pillser.com/assets/entry.client-DWgmqxdv.js:1:113602)
    at ys (https://pillser.com/assets/entry.client-DWgmqxdv.js:1:113850)
    at gs (https://pillser.com/assets/entry.client-DWgmqxdv.js:1:113728)

I appreciate you letting me know. I can see it in Sentry as well. It's odd though, it looks like it's coming directly from React. There are no traces in my own codebase. I'll try to isolate it.

Might be a browser extension fucking with the dom. Just guessing.

Yes! The paywalled SQL documents are a big annoyance

Yup, I’ve been crowing about these customer noncompetes for years now and it’s clear Anthropic has one of the worst ones. The real kicker is, since Claude Code can do anything, you’re technically not allowed to use it for anything, and everyone just depends on Anthropic not being evil

Ever get involved in the React-is-Facebook conversation?

Why act like it’s a mystery when the Claude Code repo clearly explains:

> When you use Claude Code, we collect feedback, which includes usage data (such as code acceptance or rejections), associated conversation data, and user feedback submitted via the /bug command.

They subsidize Claude Code because it gives them your codebase and chat history

They should be getting most of it from third party clients too. At least the chat and the files are being sent to or from Anthropic's own servers.

Would SRAM make weight updates prohibitive vs DRAM?

Gemini is absolutely not Gryffindor since it auto-opts users into training AI on their codebases without informed consent

I don’t know, that’s pretty daring and determined to me.

Anthropic also has legal terms that say no one is allowed to use the service for anything work related, but nobody seems to care