This looks very cool, but I find it very hard to read the text against the moving background. The lights in the "windows" of the voxel building do not provide good contrast.

I mean, this really proves the point. You dehumanize the author and anyone who even attempts to read this slop by deferring your thinking to the machine, as if this kind of human interaction was not worthy to be had. Worst of all, you dehumanize yourself.

All art is subjective. Any attempt to "verify" a piece of art would be entirely dependent on cultural and personal sensitivities. Art isn't a math problem with a solution.

But you can dissect it into concepts and see if it is something truly new to the model - if the output contains things which aren’t there in the weights, you have a nice specimen to study and, crucially, a recipe to get a bunch of matrices to output untrained things.

This is like saying: All cooks are equally good, even the most disgusting slop (e.g. water/flour soup) isn't any better than a dish from a cook with several Michelin stars. Of course the latter is better. And if it is better, it is objectively better. Even if 0.001% of people prefer flour soup.