Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more bencoder's commentslogin

https://online-go.com/learn-to-play-go is perhaps similar but doesn't go very far or in depth


Thanks for this. I'll give it a try and play around with the rest of https://online-go.com too.


https://online-go.com/ is the main & best web based server (and open source like lichess as well)


Many thanks!


The pop-up menus also have a very fast transition (compared to many websites) which aids in the feeling of snappiness. I don't know why so many sites insist on very slow transitions


Your doctor should be able to help with that and provide you only drugs that have completed clinical trials to your desired standard.


Frankly, I think most doctors aren't qualified to make such a decision by virtue of lacking PhDs: their expertise is in clinical care, not in evaluating research.


Your doctor is a smart person too but they can't simply check every single medication single handily. What even is "your desired standard" here?


Sure, but the doctor doesn't have to do much research in this case. This is front-page news in the NY Times. And about "every single medication": this is the only approved medication to delay clinical decline due to Alzheimer's. And there are only a few medications to treat symptoms.

I know this isn't a perfect world, but it doesn't seem to be asking a lot for a doctor to know this. (Especially for a drug that currently costs $56K/year and presumably will cost more next year.)


You seem to have an incredibly optimistic view of the both the medical profession and human attention span.


Doctors heavily rely on FDA to filter for effective drugs, they're not researchers with the skills to identify whether a drug has efficacy.


I remember weallgetthingscheaperwhenwebuyinagroup.com Which I think was advertised on TV in the UK when I was a teen


This is really great!


Space Shuttles actually went into orbit. The falcon 9 boosters are sub-orbital.

But I'm hoping that Starship will exceed the space shuttle massively!


The Space shuttle SRBs were somewhat re-usable while the external tank (arguably similar to the F9 second stage, except that it was used for the whole flight) was expended. The external tank was ~30,000 kg dry mass and was expended with each launch. The system could deliver ~27500kg to LEO (assuming the SRBs are fully reused which is not entirely accurate).

Falcon 9 FT Block 5 second stage has a dry mass of 4000 kg which is expended. It could deliver ~15,600 kg to LEO with first stage reuse.

The systems are definitely comparable!


Yes, everywhere I've worked (UK), the EM manages a group of teams, each with their own team lead.


Pseudonymity is essentially the default state of the internet. The "right" to it just exists by the nature of it.

If you want to remove that right you need to argue why it shouldn't exist


Excellent resource, thank you!

I think the date at the top has the wrong year (2020 / 2021)


thanks you're right about the year! I'll fix that in the next update


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: