This is impressive but I don't get it. All that work and you have a game written in JS of all things. Why not write it in a desktop language und port it to JS. Now this will always need a browser to run, feels like a waste of time to me.
- This will _only_ need a browser to run. No console. No PC rig. No Steam account. No account at all. You just need a link to play it.
- Why use a heavy game engine and all the baggage that can bring when you can make a lightweight prototype in JS, prove value in the browser, then port to desktop if you choose to.
Electron and native do not belong in the same sentence AFAIK unless you mean 'native to the browser (which happens to be included in the package)'. Tauri is the same, just bring your own 'browser' (webview, really).
We all build on top of something. Today’s browser will look like a native platform in another 20 years. Just like assembly does to our point of view today.
This still of programming does not adhere to MVC though, you can't ever swap out the frontend because it's basically merged to the backend and I suspect complex to debug simmilar to JSF.
All MVC (or rather something more modern like MVVM) happens on the server in this scenario, but it doesn't mean that it doesn't happen at all.
A different View + ModelView on top of the same Model could then be used to provide a different frontend if that is ever required (in practice, it probably won't be).
So a pattern is not mandatory with Vaadin, but you can make the UI “simple” changeable with a corresponding pattern of your choice. MVP and MVVM would be good examples of this.
I miss these kind of applications. Nowadays everything is flat tons of wasted space, unresponsive and eats 300mb ram because it runs on electron. Just compare windows 11 task manager to windows 2000 task manager.
But seriously, the poster is probably complaining about how most modern music is heavily compressed in dynamic range, so that it sounds better on crappy earbud headphones and smartphone speakers.
Apparently in germany they caught a pedo like that. Watching certain nodes and the sizes of files that are sent between them to identify the admin of a pedophile image sharing forum. Took them 1 1/2 years to identify the specific person, but they got him.
Considering this I would imagine it's pretty safe for the average user since they have to specifically target you for a long time, however it seems like with enough effort it's possible to identify someone even without Clearnet slip-ups like it was the case with Silkroad.
Once they have your address they will just storm your house and catch you on the computer, then you are done for.
to be fair, this question does not require any advanced math beyond knowing how to compute the area of a disk
to me, the impressive part of gpt is being able to understand the image and extract data from it (radius information) and come up with an actual solution (even though it got it wrong a few times)
