There is also one big thing, Europe even though it tries with the EU, is still a group of countries, not a single country.

It’s a lot easier for a business in one US state to expand to another one, but cross border business expansion in EU is still difficult.

People speak different languages, bureaucracy is different and often in a different language as well etc.

On top of that businesses are a lot more regulated than in the US.

You know we have cheaper and faster model that are now at the level of previous flagship models?

You even have models you can run locally that outperform models from a year or so ago.

They conveniently placed one person from Hamas to each house in Gaza. Right?

It’s well known that US doesn’t commit war crimes, they just make mistakes.

Yeah, like they attacked Syria, or Lebanon, or Tunis, or Iraq, or Libya.

What they have to see in this case in your opinion?

On what basis should NATO get involved?

US and Israel sneak attacked Iran during negotiations that presumably were going very well.

Iran is attacking only the countries that were involved in the attacks.

US affected war risk insurance by sinking Iranian ship, this will to although probably not much.

They are being downvoted because Nuland is an utterly insignificant diplomat, but serves well as a dog whistle for people who subscribe to the belief that the Maidan revolution in Ukraine was really some Obama organized coup. This is a story peddled by the Russian government, which of course is where Yanukovych promptly fled after having protestors shot. At the same time Russia was busy staging troops and material for the actual coup they were planning.

Yes, insignificant enough to remark "Yats is our guy" (during an intercepted but confirmed-authentic conversation with another US diplomat that Russia subsequently leaked), only for "Yats" (Arseniy Yatsenyuk) to subsequently become the Ukrainian PM. Coincidence, I'm sure...