Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Deradon's commentslogin

Question for any aviation expert: Would TCAS be triggered at such a low altitude on departure?


No, TCAS alerts are inhibited at low altitude. It goes in steps by altitude (above ground) from no alerts at all, to only traffic warning but no resolutions, to resolution but no descends, to normal full operation.


Yes, TCAS II warns all the way down to 100m AGL (around 320ft above the ground), and they were already between 1000ft and 1500ft (~400m).

It may or may not have advised what to do (to climb/descent/etc.) because that is turned off below 1000ft, and they were approximately at that altitude at the time.


Found this in the GPT-5 Announcement:

> Availability and access > GPT‑5 is starting to roll out today to all Plus, Pro, Team, and Free users, with access for Enterprise and Edu coming in one week. Pro, Plus, and Team users can also start coding with GPT‑5 in the Codex CLI (opens in a new window) by signing in with ChatGPT.


There was not really a place to put it into the rails doc. But I put a comic strip as a tribute to _why into a related blog post: https://cult.honeypot.io/reads/why-ruby-on-rails-is-not-dead...


TDD = Test Driven Development

It's not comprehensive documentation, it's a process of software development. Start with the most simple test first, make it green via the most simple implementation, refactor. (Red/Green/Refactor). Repeat until you can not adjust your tests/specs and implementation anymore.

Doing TDD you'll not create comprehensive documentation upfront but will switch your testing- and implementation-hat every few minutes.


> It's not comprehensive documentation

Not at first, but by the time your software is working, you will have comprehensive documentation about it.

> Doing TDD you'll not create comprehensive documentation upfront

Where did the idea of 'upfront' come from? Having comprehensive documentation before you have working software doesn't mean having comprehensive documentation before you have any software.


For ruby projects where I could simply put the "new test" in a new file I do this:

1. Create new test (e.g. "spec/reproduce-bug_spec.rb")

2. Ignore it locally: `echo "spec/reproduce_bug_spec.rb" >> .git/info/exclude`

3. Run bisect (something like: `git bisect run rspec spec/reproduce-bug_spec.rb`)

If running the test gets more complex (e.g. installing dependencies as they might change travelling through history), I usually create a wrapper script (and ignore it) to bisect-run-it.


Offtopic but related:

Conventional commits: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/


Another comment already mentioned the `.git/info/exclude` directory. For completeness link to the online docs: https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore

git will take 3 files into consideration for "ignoring" files:

> $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/ignore, $GIT_DIR/info/exclude, .gitignore

How I use them:

* ~/.gitignore: stuff I want to ignore everywhere (`/myNotes`, `.DS_STORE`, ...)

* <project>/.gitignore: stuff that should be ignore for this projects and shared with others

* <project>/.git/info/exclude; stuff for this project that only I want to ignore

** this is also super useful in combination with `git-bisect`


Disclaimer: I'm working at honeypot (but not involved in the documentary at all)


Here in Germany I can still get it in almost every supermarket. So I don't know if it is the EU blocking imports.


Is it the original from Huy Fong though? In the Netherlands there are a few different variants of the sauce for sale, but the original is only sold through smaller shops.

I like this one, packaging looks almost the same: https://static.ah.nl/static/product/AHI_43545239353338303138...


You're right. What I've got is NOT the original. I was misled by the almost identical look, wow. (got a FlyingGooseProduct here)


In Switzerland you can get it too.

Given that food laws need to be aligned with the EU I also don't believe that the block is an EU wide thing.


Same in Finland, which is known for being very by the book when it comes to EU regulations.



You're probably seeing Flying Goose brand, which is very similar in appearance (bottle, etc) but not the same taste.


Good guess! I checked in my fridge, and it does indeed have a flying goose logo.


In the mid 90s my parents and me were having a 2-day trip from eastern part of Germany to Paris in a "Trabbi". It was loud as hell inside the car. And still, I don't know why, I really liked this trip and like the look of this car a lot.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: