Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | DANmode's commentslogin

If by “price of the US dollar” you mean “direction of financial sentiment”, then yes.

But that’s a big mistake.


We have similar taste in cars, based on your username and domain choices!

Check your About for a typo - otherwise, super cool blog format!


> This would imply he was worker longer hours than was strictly allowed

And a bunch of office-only people who knew better came in and put electronic logging onto these drivers.

Unsurprising we’re left with the hazardous situation we have today - further risking road users’ lives.


Bartering.

Depends on your threat model, but yes.

GOS fits into pretty much any threat model where you remotely care about privacy or security

This is true.

Many more care about neither,

or intermittently care about neither,

than most take into account.


No, it doesn't. It obeys Google's long-term development strategy for the OS. Google and privacy are absolutely incompatible. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29502439

Google has implemented lots of privacy and security features in AOSP over time. The app sandbox and permission model has evolved a lot, in a good direction. The codebase is also modernized with the increasing adoption of memory safe code. At least Google seemes to have a thought out development strategy to enhance security and privacy, contrary to the projects you mentioned elsewhere in this Hacker News thread.

Also, what you link doesnt prove what you think it does. Manifest V3 is a very good thing for privacy and security. It restricts and controls the access of extensions much more. With MV2 you have much less control over your data.


Every reasonable, independent organization confirms that Manifest V3 is the end of privacy for Chrom(ium) users, e.g.,

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29502439

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41871873

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44543660

> It restricts and controls the access of extensions much more.

You mean, it restricts users even more and gives to websites the freedom to track you? I won't engage in further discussion with you, you're just trolling.


You link three things, that doesnt equate to "every independent organization". One of your links is a post by Brave and Brave isnt independent in this. The unsubstantiated fear of people for MV3 is beneficial for them, it could grow their userbase because they keep the support for MV2.

Content blocking (ad and "tracker" blocking) are convenience features, they dont foundationally improve security. Defining what a tracker is is difficult and you cant list them exhaustively. Also smart businesses and organisations can just shift to sending all data to the main domain and handling it server side to send it onwards to other domains, including third-party domains. If you dont trust a site to not send data to third party domains directly, why do you trust it to not send it indirectly?

No, I meam it restricts extensions because it does. Vouching for MV2 is like vouching for an Android OS without a proper permission model. MV3 helps against tracking, its good for privacy and security. If you want the convience of content blocking, uBlock Lite still works good enoough for many people. Though, you still lose on security and meaningful privacy (again, define a tracker and list them all, impossible) because extensions in general hurt site isolation and increase your fingerpint.


All TVs?

or just all of the TVs you can pop over to Best Buy or Walmart and toss in your car?

Plenty of non-smart displays out there.


Maybe not plenty, but Sceptre works great for me.

https://www.sceptre.com/TV/4K-UHD-TV-category1category73.htm...


Can you link me to a "non-smart" TV that can be ordered on the Walmart website? Curious cause I didn't think this was a thing any more, and I wasn't able to find one.


You’re making my point.

Take a half-step beyond the easy-reach (Walmart, BB), and they’re not impossible to find (as you made it seem).

Just…unnecessarily difficult.


And they cost an arm and a leg. Yes, all TVs. You ought to be able to go to Best Buy or Walmart and buy a TV that doesn't spy on you. That should not be controversial.

Nobody said it was.

At least, not in this subthread.


He’s…something.

Have you considered using mail forwarding, or sites like Swappa.com with forwarding built in?

Hoping this helps you get your hands on a cheap Pixel!


That's not only adding to cost but also doesn't solve the issue of why you would buy a new phone - warranty.

They just said Pixels.

Nothing about brand new ones.

Just that the new ones might be easier to buy international.

Phone without warranty is better than phone you hate, or phone with OS you disagree fundamentally with - in my opinion.


Not the worst choices!

Indeed. However, in terms of the independence, better choices exist.

If someone is making a new browser, considering you want to support the same web standards as everyone else, being independent is pretty low on the priority lists. In fact it is more of a liability since it could make for compatibility issues.

I don't understand what you're talking about. Firefox supports all reasonable standards and so does GNU/Linux.

I don’t have a strong position in this chat, but you should know what you did there is such a fallacy there’s a name for it.

It’s a fun one, though, because JKR’s whole life and works involve strong themes surrounding eugenics.

So it’s really not that far of a stretch to make this association in her case.

In her books the wizards fight against wizard Hitler and his eugenic holocaust. In real life, she engages in her own form of eugenic crusade where she believes the sex organs you are born with define your personality, identity, and your criminal tendencies.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: